The case for
change management: Costs and risks of poorly managing change
In Prosci’s 2007 and 2009 benchmarking studies, the top trend
identified by study participants was a greater recognition of
the need for and value of change management. While some find
themselves in a situation where change management is being
requested, many other practitioners are still working diligently
to make a compelling case for
the need for change management. For these practitioners, Prosci
is releasing a five part series on the case for change
management. Learn how to effectively “sell” change management to project leaders and
executives in your organization by directly connecting
change management to project and
organizational outcomes.
This is the fifth tutorial of the series. This tutorial
presents the costs and risks
of poorly managing change. When the people side of change is
ignored or poorly managed, the project and the organization take
on additional costs and risks. From this perspective, effective
change management can be viewed as a cost avoidance technique
and risk mitigation tactic. Read on to find out what types of
costs and risks you can help your organization avoid by applying
change management.

Consequences of mismanaging change
Each of us has been a part of a change that was poorly
managed - either as the offender or as the victim. When projects
and initiatives are mismanaged from the "people side" of change
perspective, results and outcomes are not achieved. We know from
previous tutorials in this series that the
individual changes
that culminate in organizational change do not take place. We
know that we have a
lower likelihood of meeting objectives,
finishing on time and finishing on budget. And we know that
speed of adoption will be slower, ultimate utilization will be
lower and proficiency will be less - all dragging down the
expected returns.
There are two more perspectives to add to the discussion
about the impact of not managing change effectively:
costs and
risks. These perspectives play out on two levels - the
project or initiative level and the
organizational level. While
some of these costs and risks may seem "soft" - many of them are
quantifiable and can have a significant impact on financial
performance - both of the project and of the organization as a
whole.
| |
Costs |
Risks |
| Project level |
|
|
| Organizational level |
|
|
Project level impacts
Project level impacts are related directly to the specific
project or initiative that is not utilizing change management.
These projects can impact tools, technologies, processes,
reporting structures and job roles. They can result from
strategic planning, from internal stimuli such as performance
issues, from external stimuli such as regulation or competitive
threats, or from demands by customers and suppliers. The
initiatives may be formalized as projects with project managers,
budgets, schedules, etc. or they may be informal in nature but
still impact how people do their jobs.
While these projects and initiatives can take on a number of
different forms, the fact remains that ignoring or mismanaging the people
side of change has real consequences for project performance.
Below are some examples of the costs and risks at a project
level when we do not manage the people side of change.
Costs:
- Project delays
- Missed milestones
- Budget overruns
- Rework required on design
- Loss of work by project team
Risks:
- Resistance – active and passive
- Project put on hold
- Resources not made available
- Obstacles appear unexpectedly
- Project fails to deliver results
- Project is fully abandoned
When change management is applied effectively, we can prevent
or avoid costs and mitigate risks tied to how individual
employees adopt and utilize a change.
Organizational level impacts
The organizational level is a step above the project level
impacts. These costs and risks are felt not only by the project
team, but by the organization as a whole. Many of these impacts
extend well beyond the lifecycle of a
given project. When valuable
employees leave the organization, the costs are severe and in
some cases we can never recover fully. A legacy of failed change
presents a significant and ever-present backdrop that all future
changes will encounter.
The organizational costs and risks of poorly managing change
include:
Costs:
- Productivity plunges (deep and sustained)
- Loss of valued employees
- Reduced quality of work
Risks:
- Impact on customers
- Impact on suppliers
- Morale declines
- Legacy of failed change
- Stress, confusion, fatigue
- Change saturation
Applying change management effectively on a particular
project or initiative allows you to avoid organizational costs
and risks which last well beyond the life of the project.
A third dimension of costs and risks
There is one final dimension of costs and risks to consider,
beyond the project and organizational impacts. When we try to
introduce a change without using effective change management, we
are much less likely to implement the change and fully realize
the expected results and outcomes. This final dimension provides
answers to the question: what if the
change is not fully implemented?
If the change does not deliver the results and outcomes - in
large part because we ignored the people side of change - there
are additional costs and risk including:
Costs if the change is not fully implemented:
- Lost investment made in the project
- Lost opportunity to have invested in other projects
Risks if the change is not fully implemented:
- Expenses not reduced
- Efficiencies not gained
- Revenue not increased
- Market share not captured
- Waste not reduced
- Regulations not met
Positioning change management
This tutorial presented another approach for making the case
for change management. Instead of focusing on the "up side" of
applying change management effectively on a project or
initiative, the line of thinking here related to the costs and
risks of ignoring or poorly managing change. Communicating the
impact of change management, or lack thereof, in terms of costs
and risks can be a powerful approach if these are prevailing
concepts for your organization or your audiences.
-
Effective change management helps us
avoid additional and excessive costs we will incur if we do
not adequately manage the people side of change.
-
Effective change management helps us
mitigate additional and excessive risks we will take on if
we do not adequately manage the people side of change.
Positioning change management as a cost avoidance technique
or a risk mitigation tactic can be an effective approach to
sharing the value of change management and gaining support for
assigning the time, energy and resources to managing the people
side of change.
| |
Costs |
Risks |
| Project level |
- Project delays
- Missed milestones
- Budget overruns
- Rework required on design
- Loss of work by project team
- Your specific project costs
|
- Resistance – active and passive
- Project put on hold
- Resources not made available
- Obstacles appear unexpectedly
- Project fails to deliver results
- Project is fully abandoned
- Your specific project risks
|
| Organizational level |
- Productivity plunges (deep and sustained)
- Loss of valued employees
- Reduced quality of work
- Your specific organizational costs
|
- Impact on customers
- Impact on suppliers
- Morale declines
- Legacy of failed change
- Stress, confusion, fatigue
- Change saturation
- Your specific organizational risks
|
| If the change
is not implemented |
- Lost investment made in the project
- Lost opportunity to have invested
in other projects
- Your specific costs if the change is
not fully implemented
|
- Expenses not reduced
- Efficiencies not gained
- Revenue not increased
- Market share not captured
- Waste not reduced
- Regulations not met
- Your specific risks if the change is
not fully implemented
|
Did you miss one of the first "Case for change management"
tutorials?
Module 1 - The case for change management
overview: results and outcomes
Module 2 - The individual is the unit of change
Module 3 - Correlating success and change management
effectiveness
Module 4 - ROI of change management
|