![]() |
Welcome to the Change Management Tutorial Series Home | Bookstore | Training | Tutorials | Benchmarking | Webinars |
About the participantsGeographic distributionParticipants in the 2009 study represented 65 countries across the globe. Figure A shows the geographic distribution based on region. Representation from the United States increased slightly but was still in-line with previous reports in the 40% - 45% range. Representation from Australia, Canada and Africa increased while representation from Europe, Asia and Pacific Islands and Central and South America each decreased.
Figure A – Geographic distribution
Role of participantsThe role of participants in the 2009 benchmarking study is shown in Figure B. The top three roles were: change management team leader, external consultant and project team leader. There was a significant increase in participation by change management team members.
Figure B – Role of participant
IndustryFigure C shows the industry representation in the 2009 benchmarking study. Industries represented by less than 2% of total study participants were included in the “Other” category. The top five industries were the same as in 2007, although “Consulting” and “Government – State or Local” both moved up one spot in the list.
Figure C – Industry segment
Size of organizationParticipants in the 2009 study represented a wide range of organizations based on overall organization size (Figure D). The largest participation came from organizations with more than $5 billion in annual revenue. Organizations with annual revenue of less than $10 million made up the second largest group. Overall, organizations represented in the 2009 study were fairly similar in size to those in the previous studies.
Figure D – Size of organization
About the projectsProject stageSeventy percent of participants reported on projects that were in the implementation phase or completed, up from 65% in 2007 and 60% in 2005 (Figure E).
Figure E – Project stage
Scope of the changeProjects in the 2009 study had smaller scopes than in previous studies (Figure F). In the 2009 study, only 44% of projects impacted the entire enterprise, compared to over 50% in the last three studies. Projects impacting multiple divisions increased from 15% of study participants in 2007 to 20% of study participants in 2009.
Figure F – Scope of the change
Project investmentWhile project scope decreased slightly overall, the investment being made in the projects reported on in the 2009 study increased over the 2007 study. As shown in Figure G, projects with investments of more than $10 million USD increased to 21% in 2009 from 18% in 2007. An even larger increase occurred in projects with investments between $1 million USD and $5 million USD, from 17% of participants in the 2007 study to 22% in the 2009 study. Representation from projects with investments of less than $1 million USD decreased in the 2009 study.
Figure G – Project investment
Number of employees impactedFigure H shows the breakdown of the number of employees impacted by the projects that were reported on in the 2009 benchmarking study. While the representation in the 2009 study remained fairly close to recent studies, there was an increase in representation from projects that impacted between 1000 and 5000 employees. Responses for more than 5000 employees were further broken down in the 2009 study. Of the 20% of study participants reporting projects that impacted more than 5000 employees, 40% impacted between 5000 and 10,000 employees; 15% impacted between 10,000 and 20,000 employees and 45% impacted more than 20,000 employees.
Figure H – Number of impacted employees
### Email this tutorial to a friend
Email this page to a friend | Email a Prosci analyst or call 970-203-9332
|
|||||||||||||||
Tutorials | Bookstore | Benchmarking | Articles | Training | Register | Webinars | Resources | Home Copyright Prosci 1996-2012
|
|
| Contact Prosci email: Prosci email form phone: 970-203-9332 or 800-700-2831 1367 S. Garfield Ave. Loveland, CO 80537 USA |
|