The list below represents the new questions and topics addressed in
the 2009 benchmarking study. The items in bold
are expanded upon in the callouts in the right-hand column of the table.
For the complete findings,
order the 2009 edition of Prosci's Best Practices in Change
Management benchmarking report.
-
Methods for measuring change management effectiveness
-
Consequences of starting change management late
-
Action steps if change management was started late
-
Contributors to starting change management early in the project
-
Team structure used
-
Structure preferences and advantages
-
Decisions on the number of change management resources -
influencing and constraining factors
-
Level of experience and expertise of change management resources
-
Building change management knowledge
-
Change management FTE as a percentage
of project FTE
|
| Team structure used - 62% of participants
used a structure where the change management
resource was part of the project team; 28% used a
structure where the change management resource was
external to the project team; 10% used an
alternative or hybrid structure. The top advantage
of being part of the project team was increased
project knowledge while the top advantage of using a
resource external to the team was access to
leadership. |
|
-
Change management resourcing levels relative to project size
(scope, investment, impacted employees)
-
Change management budget data relative to project size
(scope,
investment, impacted employees)
-
Sponsor role challenges
-
Tactics for educating sponsors about their roles
-
Engaging reluctant senior leaders
-
Sponsor role perspective at beginning of project
-
Access to sponsors
-
Sponsor communication frequency
-
Importance of manager and supervisor
involvement in success
-
Manager role challenges
|
| Sponsor role challenges - The role
sponsors struggled with the most was communicating
directly with employees, followed by building the
coalition of support and then participating actively
and visibly. |
| Manager role challenges - Managers
struggled the most with managing resistance and
coaching employees through transitions. |
|
-
Tactics for gaining support from managers
-
How to support managers and supervisors during change
-
Duration of manager and supervisor training
-
Additional knowledge building approaches
-
Evaluating manager and supervisor effectiveness
-
Attributes of a successful change message
-
Attributes of successful communicators
-
Tactics for correcting misinformation and misunderstandings
-
Steps for dealing with employee resistance
-
Avoidable employee resistance
|
| Tactics for correcting misinformation and
misunderstandings - Participants identified six
tactics for correcting misinformation and
misunderstandings. The top three tactics were
enabling open discussion time, identifying and
addressing current rumors immediately and engaging
sponsors. |
|
-
Proactive steps for avoiding or preventing resistance from
employees
-
Steps for dealing with manager resistance
-
Avoidable manager resistance
-
Proactive steps for avoiding or preventing resistance from
managers
-
Criteria for choosing a change management consultant
-
Perception of change management by project teams
-
Steps to
engage project team in change management
-
Project management integration on projects
-
Obstacles with project team
-
What would you do differently on the next project regarding
integration
|
| Steps to engage project team in change
management - The number one step for engaging
the project team in change management was working
collaboratively with the team - including having
project team participation in change management
planning and having change management team
participation in project activities. |
|
-
Change management training for project team
-
Identifying change readiness
-
Readiness assessment factors
-
Readiness evaluation
-
Main organizational barriers or challenges
-
Justifying change management
-
Tactics for justifying to senior leaders
-
Conditions that resulted in not having to justify
-
Percentage of projects in the organization using change
management
-
Group dedicated to change management deployment
|
| Tactics for justifying change management to
senior leaders - Participants identified over a
dozen tactics for justifying change management to
senior leaders. The top three tactics were: 1)
lessons learned from past failures, 2) showed the
negative consequences of poorly managed change and
3) translated change management into tangible
financial impacts. |
|
-
Location of group
-
Desired location of group and advantages
-
Identifying change saturation
-
Inventory kept of all changes
-
Portfolio process in place
-
Tactics for managing the portfolio of change
-
Resolving project conflicts
-
Number of major initiatives underway
-
Change management trends in 2009
|
| Inventory and portfolio management process
- Just over one-third of participants (34%) kept
an inventory of all changes underway. Just under
one-fourth of participants (24%) had a process in
place for managing the portfolio of change. |
|